An Accra Circuit Court has issued a bench warrant for the arrest of Kweku Osei Korankye Asiedu, popularly known as KOKA, a marketer and communicator of the New Patriotic Party, after he failed to appear before the court to respond to serious criminal allegations involving threats of death and the publication of false information.
The court’s decision marks a significant development in a case that has attracted public attention due to the involvement of a political communicator and allegations involving personnel of the Economic and Organised Crime Office, an institution responsible for investigating financial crimes, corruption related offences and organised criminal activities in Ghana.
Asiedu was expected to appear before the court to answer accusations that he allegedly issued threats against the lives of EOCO officials and circulated statements authorities consider false and capable of disturbing public order. However, when the matter was called, the accused was absent, prompting the court to take action against him.
The prosecution, led by Chief Inspector Wisdom Alorwu, informed the court that Asiedu had been properly notified about the hearing but failed to attend. The prosecutor described the failure to appear as a disregard for the authority of the court and requested appropriate action.
Following the submissions from the prosecution, the court granted the request and issued a bench warrant directing law enforcement authorities to arrest and bring Asiedu before the court. The case has subsequently been adjourned to August 25, 2026, when further proceedings are expected to continue.
The charges against Asiedu stem from allegations that he made statements threatening the lives of officials of EOCO following investigations involving members associated with the governing political establishment.
According to the prosecution, the complainants in the matter are employees of EOCO who reported concerns over videos circulated on social media platforms in which Asiedu allegedly made statements perceived as direct threats against their safety.
The prosecution told the court that on July 14, 2026, Asiedu was invited by authorities for questioning regarding a video believed to have been recorded and shared online, in which he allegedly warned EOCO personnel.
Investigators further alleged that the video, which was reportedly recorded on May 29, 2026, contained statements suggesting that the locations of EOCO officers were known and that they could be targeted.
The prosecution quoted the accused as allegedly stating, “We know the officers’ houses, we know where they stay, and we will kill you.”
Authorities have described such remarks as serious concerns that could create fear among public officials and interfere with the lawful operations of state institutions.
The prosecution also presented another allegation involving a separate video released on July 13, 2026, in which Asiedu allegedly claimed that instructions had come from the Presidency preventing people from providing food to Dennis Miracles Aboagye, who was then in EOCO custody assisting with ongoing investigations.
According to the prosecution, the claim was false and had the potential to mislead the public, encourage tension and undermine confidence in EOCO officials carrying out their lawful responsibilities.
The state further alleged that after the circulation of the video, the driver of the Executive Director of EOCO was pursued by approximately 20 unidentified individuals riding motorcycles. Prosecutors told the court that the group was suspected of intending to attack the driver, raising additional security concerns connected to the accused’s alleged actions.
The prosecution maintained that the statements attributed to Asiedu created an atmosphere of fear and anxiety among EOCO employees, particularly those involved in sensitive investigations.
Following his arrest, investigators said Asiedu participated in police questioning and allegedly admitted aspects of the accusations in his caution statement. The details of those alleged admissions are expected to form part of the evidence to be presented as the case progresses.
The matter has renewed public debate over the responsibilities of political communicators, freedom of expression and the limits of public commentary, particularly when statements involve threats against individuals performing official duties.
Legal experts have often emphasised that while citizens and political actors have constitutional rights to express opinions and criticise state institutions, those rights must operate within the boundaries of the law, especially where statements are alleged to threaten personal safety, incite hostility or obstruct public officials from carrying out their duties.
The case also places renewed attention on the relationship between political activism and accountability, as Ghana continues to navigate discussions surrounding political communication, social media influence and the protection of state institutions.
As the court awaits the execution of the bench warrant and the accused’s appearance, the proceedings are expected to provide further clarity on the allegations and the evidence surrounding the claims of threats and false publication.
The next stage of the case on August 25, 2026, will therefore be closely watched as authorities, political observers and the public await developments in a matter that sits at the intersection of politics, law enforcement and freedom of expression.
